The report, titled “A Strategic Assessment of China’s Light Passenger Vehicle Aftermarket, Sixth Edition,” stems from Technomic Asia’s ongoing primary research into the Chinese auto marketplace and its key players. Other major findings indicate that the light passenger vehicle car parc has expanded to more than 62 million units, with middle-aged vehicles (4-9 years old) reaching a 50 percent share. More information is available at www.technomicasia.com/auto.

“The aging and expanding parc, coupled with private ownership of vehicles at more than 70 percent today, supports strong growth in the parts and service market,” said Steve Ganster, managing director of Technomic Asia and primary author of the report.

“The market is fragmenting as more vehicles from recent market entrants, notably the Japanese, hit the road,” Ganster said. “Both local and international parts and service companies, as well as retailers and other service organizations, are aggressively developing their infrastructures to penetrate this dynamic market. Though many challenges exist, the outlook for growth remains robust, with the market expected to expand at 21 percent per year through 2015.”

“The market’s greatest opportunity, and also its most significant challenge, is in solving the complex and multi-layered distribution structure”, states Ganster. “For companies who can bring scale, expertise and sound strategy to solve distribution challenges, the prize will be great.”

This unique China auto report offers valuable statistics, insights and analyses to assist management to successfully address this important market, including:

• Perspective on China’s automotive market, including a long-term growth outlook for China’s light vehicle market in terms of types of vehicles, key OEMs, growth drivers and constraints, etc.
• Overview of the automotive aftermarket in terms parts and service, covering size, segmentation, parts types, key players and trends
• An assessment of China’s automotive parc in terms of size, vehicle composition, age, technology base and future growth
• Detailed descriptions of key market segments, covering maintenance and light repair, collision and other repairs with insights on market size, segmentation, services provided, pricing, etc., and current and forecasted 2015 value by vehicle and service type
• A detailed evaluation of the parts supply chain, with descriptions of structure, key players, pricing characteristics and future dynamics
• Perspective on key opportunities and challenges facing players in China’s automotive aftermarket

For more information on the report, or to purchase a copy, please visit www.technomicasia.com/auto or call our offices at +1-919-855-5437 (U.S.) or +86-21-6473-2588 (China).

About Technomic Asia
Technomic Asia, a division of Tompkins International (www.tompkinsinc.com), is a business strategy and supply chain consultancy with more than 30 years of experience helping clients plan and execute Asian growth and operational strategies. Technomic Asia assists companies in entering the Asian market or in expanding their business by providing critical market insight, an understanding of business potential and assistance in designing the optimum strategy for success. Technomic Asia’s Steven Ganster authored of “The China Ready Company,” a book that details the process to develop a successful China strategy. www.technomicasia.com

-30-

Media interviews with Steve Ganster contact amaruggi AT providentpartners DOT net or call 612-293-7640

Three years ago, while in China, we were on the road with a client to source and manufacture high-end eyeglass frames. My project manager had pre-screened about twenty factories which we vetted and produced a list of ten sites for further evaluation and site visits.

I arrived in Wenzhou with the client for the first leg of the tour. Things were going well in terms of finding the right supplier. Some top of the line factories with just the right products and pricing. We had two agreements by the end of day two.

On day three my client insisted that we go visit a factory he found on the China suppliers directory website Alibaba.com After finding a potential supplier on his own, the client claimed their website looked great, they had dozens of styles to choose from, they stated they could do any kind of custom work etc, etc. I explained to my client that in my years of experience, it was unlikely we would find anything of value in such a visit and that without prescreening and vetting it might be a waste of time. But, he insisted, so I, realizing sometimes the best lesson is the one you learn first-hand, relented.

We drove almost 90 minutes off of our scheduled route. After getting lost several times we finally found the entrance to the factory.It was mid-August, about 90 degrees with 90 percent humidity. Dust was blowing everywhere and garbage was piled high all around the building.

We walked in the front door and found some curious “workers” on the floor. Namely, pigs, chickens and roosters. We were led up the stairs to the 2nd floor workshop where we found three people putting frames together. It turns out they were pieceworkers hired by another factory.

Politeness is a way of life in China, regardless of the time it may take. While drinking tea our conversation confirmed what our eyes were seeing much earlier in this journey. Then we left.

Sinking into the back seat of the car, and after a deep sigh, my client simply said, “I’m sorry”. Lesson learned and a better one I could not have stated as convincingly as half-a-day’s out of the way journey.

This is one of the more benign things that can happen to a company looking to source and manufacture goods from Alibaba.com or without a disciplined vetting process. It is therefore not surprising that recent news reports about the resignation of two top executives from Alibaba recently due to unfettered fraud on the website.

In the summer of 2005 we also visited a “factory” from Alibaba that a client insisted we see. It turns out it was a shell company that was supposedly manufacturing pet supplies. First words out of their mouth “I don’t think we can do business because our company is banned in the US for parts related to weapons of mass destruction. In that case, we thought better to skip the tea.

These stories and literally dozens of other I could recount illustrates what I have been telling individuals, start-ups, SMEs and even a few Fortune 1000 companies for six years. You can window shop on Alibaba to get a sense of pricing and product categories, but for anything else you need a plan for opportunistic through strategic sourcing, a sourcing professional and a presence on the ground in China to execute a multi-phase evaluation and vetting project.

We are working through a series of conversations with Steve Crandall, Vice President for Implementation Services here at Technomic Asia, based in Shanghai.  In Steve’s nearly 20 years of working in China, he has helped many foreign companies – primarily small and mid-sized ones – to establish operations in China.  We’ve been addressing a number of topics in this series, but today’s hits very close to home for a number of companies as Steve and I talk about the “China Price” syndrome …

In our last Podcast, I had a conversation with Steve Crandall, Vice President in charge of Implementation Services here at Technomic Asia.  We talked about how important people are to a winning China strategy … how to look for them, recruit them, train them and keep them.  After we were done recording it, I asked Steve if he thought that maybe we were being too “basic” … that this was stuff that people already know.  He said, “People might know this stuff, but its always good to be reminded of it … knowing and doing are two different things.”

Well, it turns out that Steve was right … because since we posted that Podcast, we have had LOTS of comments on how useful the information was and how important it was to revisit the basics.  So to that end, we are going to go “back to the basics” again in terms of thinking about China and building your China strategy.  This is particularly critical during these times in the corporate business planning cycle … the silly season where bold strategies are considered and aggressive plans developed.  And China – given its centrality to most global business plans – is susceptible to such ridiculous hopes, dreams and schemes.  So let’s go “back to the future”, if you will, and think about our China strategies from the beginning.

Click on the links to listen to today’s Podcast …

Following is part two of my interview with Steve Crandall, VP for Technomic Asia in charge of our small- and mid-sized enterprise (SME) practice.  Today we focus on the importance of hiring and retaining the right people in your China operations.

Here on the China Business Blog and Podcast, we focus on being very logical and very practical … at least as logical and practical as China allows one to be.  Over the 25 years we have been working in China, we’ve seen a lot of experimentation, trying this and that to see what works.  We’ve even done a fair amount of it ourselves … and that’s fine for many multinational companies with deep pockets who can afford to try this and, if it doesn’t work, try that.

However, there is a group of companies for which this experimentation approach doesn’t always work so well … the Small- and Mid-sized Enterprise or as they are commonly referred to, the SMEs.  And that is the theme for a new series here on the China Business Podcast – The SME.

To discuss this topic with me, we are going to bring in the newest member of the Technomic Asia team, Steve Crandall, who recently joined us as Vice President in our Implementation practice.  We have been seeing a need lately to increase our capabilities in helping our clients execute their organic strategies in China – setting up manufacturing, hiring, establishing sales teams and pipelines, executing a sourcing strategy etc.  Steve comes to us with a long history in China, starting in the 1980s when he was a student here.  Steve went on to set up the first foreign owned car dealership in China when he set up Crandall Ford up in Tianjin (Steve comes from several generations of Ford dealers back in Ohio).  He then went on to start up several manufacturing and sales operations for SMEs in China, incubating them until the client was ready to take over.  After a stint at Ernst and Young where he had to wear a tie to work everyday, he came to join us.  Steve has been a good friend for a number of years and we are thrilled to have him in the Technomic Asia family.

There is no standard definition of the SME, just as there is no standard definition of the Multinational Corporation, or MNC.  However, generally, the SMEs are defined by their size – less than 500 employees – and their ownership – privately held or invested by a private equity company or other financial backer.  Now I’m sure I’m going to get some letters about this … because some subsidiaries of MNCs essentially have to stand on their own and really act like SMEs.  As my teenagers say: “Whatever!”  The key commonality here is that an SME is facing the same challenges in China as any other company here but they often have less global experience to work from and they typically do not have such deep pockets to do a lot of experimentation.  They have to get it right the first time.

Over the coming weeks, we are going to explore some issues that impact SMEs in unique ways such as HR, manufacturing, sales, operations, etc.  You will be hearing many of the same themes that we’ve been hitting for years here on the China Business Podcast … but we will be discussing them as they impact the SME and will explore several unique ways that we’ve seen SMEs handle these issues.

We begin the series today with the age-old issue of market opportunity …

I am going to start this post out with a warning: in the world of global economic intrigue and gamesmanship, the following ranks rather low on the excitement scale … but on June 22nd, China announced that it would scrap the export tax rebate it gives to China producers of 406 categories of export products.  These products include steel, non-ferrous metals, fertilizers, chemicals, plastics, rubber, and glass.  This was the first adjustment in the export tax rebate since July 2009, when it was increased as part of China’s stimulus program.

Now I know that, for most of you, the phrase “export tax rebate” doesn’t send a thrilling chill down your spine … and if it DOES, then maybe you need to get out more.  But we think that there is something deeper here that is worth exploring just a bit further.

This policy announcement is coming at an interesting time.  The communication between the U.S. and China on the global economy and the RMB valuation has had more passive-aggressive subtext than a Midwestern family Thanksgiving – “PLEASE pass the SALT, DEAR!!” – so one rather hoped that any move by China would be attempt to alleviate some of the stress … as in “Please ADJUST your RMB rate, DEAR!!”.  However, at first blush, there is not a huge material impact to the trade imbalance as the policy change is not expected to make a major dent in exports, since it affects only $11 billion in exports, or about 1% of the total.

However, we think that the importance of this policy change goes beyond any material impact.  We think that China is trying to telegraph some very specific messages to two constituencies: the international community and its own people.

First of all, the Chinese government is signaling to its own domestic manufacturers that it wants them to curb overcapacity, move up the value chain, and turn away from the export-driven model of growth.  In this new policy, the government has focused on the environmental benefits of discouraging the production and export of these 406 products, which are highly energy-intensive and polluting, thereby scoring a point with the Greens, both domestic and international.  Lower production will save energy and reduce greenhouse emissions, in line with China’s stated promise of reducing energy consumption per unit of GDP by 20% from 2005 to 2010.  Again, this move is not going to get China all the way to environmentally friendly heaven, but it’s a step in the right direction.

At the same time, this move is a response to recent global pressures on the RMB and non-tariff trade barriers, trying to get China to be an engine of global recovery, rather than continuing its export-driven model.  Europe and the US are trying to export their way to recovery, so someone’s exports have got to go down.  By partially eliminating the export rebate, in line with RMB revaluation, China can better claim that it’s pulling its weight globally.  Given that this is a partial rollback of the stimulus package, China can also claim that it’s dealing with stimulus-induced preferences for domestic industry, further reducing what some say is over-investment by the Chinese government in their own infrastructure which has led to an over-inflation of China’s GDP growth.  So that’s quieting 4 squawking birds of international conscience with one stone of administrative action … not bad at all.  The tortured metaphor of that last sentence does not give enough Kudos to China for this move … China is definitely starting to understand that, for its policy changes to have impact, symbolism – properly spun – can have more power than substance in the world of international diplomacy.

However, of the two possible audiences for this move – internal and external – we fall on the side of this being a stronger message to its own domestic producers, an encouragement to move up the value-chain and pursue domestic innovation, not just be the manufacturer for the world.  Steel is a good example.  48 of the 406 affected products are made, at least in part, from steel that, until this action, had enjoyed a 9 percent rebate.  Steel exports from China have grown 127% year-on-year, and 266% alone just this past May.  However, along with this growth have been the installation of new steel-making facilities in China … despite a general ban on adding more capacity, Chinese companies found a way to build 40 new steel plants in this past year.  This has resulted in the overproduction of low value-added steel which means that China’s steel industry profits have come almost entirely from the 9% rebate.

But this new ruling makes a fine distinction between the two types of steel products. The rebate on the commodity steel goes away but the higher value-added steel products such as cold-rolled and galvanized steel – which many US buyers are more interested in anyway – still enjoy a 13% export rebate.  So, by getting rid of only the rebates on low-valued added products, the government is sending a signal to the domestic industry: “Start moving up the value chain, and stop building so bloody much capacity.  Move away from the low-cost export model and start innovating.”

After over 20 years of concerted effort on building their economy through exports, China is going to take awhile to turn this ship around.  In other words, China is not going to becoming a domestically-driven (and particularly a consumer-driven) economy any time soon … I don’t even think the next 20 years is going to get them there.  But bit by bit, they are moving that direction … and this recent policy change is one of those bits.  And keep your eyes and ears open for future policy announcements … more and more you are going to see the double purposes behind policy changes as China navigates the dangerous waters between both the internal and external constituencies most impacted by such changes.

So when our research manager, Frank Tsai, came to me and said that he could see some value in a review of the week’s news on China, I admit that I was a bit skeptical. It seemed to me like we were just anthologizing stuff already out there.  But as he kept talking and showing me some material, I came around … there is a TON of good writing on China and, while it is impossible to take it all in, it is important to try.  So we are going to try an experiment … every week, we’ll highlight some of the things that interest us about the news on China, adding comments where we feel we can add something or just setting it out there for you to take in.  We won’t stop the original stuff … that’s our bread and butter (and besides, its cheaper than therapy for us) … but let’s see how this goes.  Drop us a line and let us know what you think and/or clue us in to things that you think we should be paying attention to.

OK, here goes…

Living in a Bubble?

When your Chinese friends are making six figure (USD) salaries, and they say they don’t FEEL rich, even though the cost of living is almost invariably much lower in China, you know something is odd.  They feel that way because housing costs in Shanghai are 20 to 50 times annual income for the typical ($10,000/year) worker, and the better homes that rich Chinese executives want to buy are still 10 to 20 times annual income.   According to the China Daily, real estate prices rose at their fastest rate in two years in February, going up 10.7% year-on-year in 70 major cities, and undoubtedly even faster in major cities like Shanghai and Beijing.  Housing and housing-related purchases, according to the Global Times, now account for 40% of consumer spending, and have accounted for 20% of GDP since 1998.  While the government has recognized the risk that rising asset prices pose for inflation and social stability, and has signaled measures to curb the property market, some investment banks like UBS are, apparently, still bullish on Chinese property.  Needless to say, the continuing boom in housing-related purchases is great news for many foreign companies – from an IKEA, to home appliances, to decoration services, to home water purifiers.  However, we all get the feeling that “something” is out there and, at least among average people who have become “overnight millionaires” just by owning homes in Shanghai, there does seem to be the ominous feeling that values can’t keep rising.

Working for a Living

Years ago, the rallying cry for multinational participation in China was “cheap labor!!”.  Well, while labor costs in China are still much lower than North America or Western Europe, we are seeing some changes here as well.   In recent months, factory wages have risen by about 20 percent, as many migrant workers have gone home for the Chinese New Year and decided to stay home, having found better (and often less arduous) jobs in their hometowns.  According to the China Economic Review, many factories have had to lure back workers with substantial raises and that the average wage for a migrant worker in Shenzhen is now about $200/month.  Despite fears of a labor shortage at the low end, however, college graduates at the higher end are facing dimmer prospects, as detailed in pieces in both the LA Times and the New York Times.  So it seems that demand in the labor market is becoming curiously U-shaped, with factory workers getting raises and the experienced managers seeing their wages double and triple in just a few years, while recent graduates suffer on subsistence pay, even at good companies.

Gloom and Doom

Year-end predictions are lots of fun … you get to talk eloquently about what just happened (and drop a few “I-told-you-so’s” in if you can) and then go all Nostradamus and predict a gloomy future.  If you are right, kudos to you.  If you are wrong, that’s OK because it means the gloom-and-doom didn’t happen and everyone is basically happy.  This could be the case in an article in the New York Times that came out last December that highlighted the three greatest dangers that could derail the Chinese economy are inflation, protectionism, and inequality.  Let’s see how they’ve been doing so far …

• Chinese economists have been sanguine about Febuary’s 2.7 increase in the CPI, and policy shifts are unlikely in the near-term.  However, we’ve seen instances where China moves pretty quickly against inflation should the need arise so that might be the source of their comfort.
• Pressure for protectionism against China could rise, however, in light of China’s 46% export increase in February and slim chances that the government will let the RMB will appreciate.
• Growing inequality is reflected in the growing ranks of Chinese billionaires, and in a sign that the government is concerned about inequality, it recently capped the compensation of bank executives in line with similar measures in the West.

Hmmm … seems they’re doing pretty well so far, but the year is still young.  Stay tuned for more.

OK… I am just going to put it out there: these last 10 years have kind of sucked.  Years from now, we are going to look back on the first decade of the new millennium and only the very strong among us are going to be able to avoid using a variety of four-letter words to describe it.  From the rise of terrorism to the meltdown in the global economy, these have been tough times.

Things didn’t start well, of course, with the futuristic “Y2K” problem. It was, for the most part, just IT consultants crying wolf.  But to so completely lack faith in our own technology so as to doubt its ability to handle a digit change in the thousands column does not speak well of our confidence or our technology.

But, for me, what started things off on the wrong foot was our inability to agree with simply what to call this decade.  The “Aughts”? The “O’s”?  The “Naughts”?  Given the current state of the average American’s bank account, “the Nils” sounds like it’s the most appropriate.  But c’mon, folks … if we can’t even name the stinking decade, how are we supposed to handle the real issues.  Frankly, I am a bit ashamed that we Americans couldn’t come up with the marketing slogan that we could all hold hands around.  We are a country that brought you such ditties as Hooters, Cabbage Patch Kids and the Pet Rock.  And we can’t name a decade?  How embarrassing!

However, contrary to the desperation much of the rest of the world is facing, China had a pretty good decade.  From a GDP of about $2,000 per person when 2000 started, China is projected to be over $6,500 per person heading into 2010.   And unlike other changing economies such as the former Soviet Union, China’s political infrastructure didn’t go through a meltdown in the face of such growth.  Certainly, there were many doomsayers predicting the imminent collapse of China, but so far, these people with their Nostradamus For Dummies guidebooks have been, thankfully, quite wrong.

The Chinese authorities are, certainly, giving themselves a big Attaboy for their performance in this past decade.  Not only has their growth been the best in the world, but they’ve landed some pretty big gigs to show it off including the Olympics and the Shanghai Expo.  Fair enough, let’s give China their due … but let’s also look forward to the next decade and make some guesses ourselves as to what we might expect.

Here at Technomic Asia, we are celebrating our 25^th year in China … that is, if I might say so, pretty impressive for a boutique consulting firm where many of our peer firms have burned out long ago.  However, if you would have asked any one of us when we first started in China in 1985 to predict what China would look like in 2010, there is NO WAY that any of us would have come close to envisioning what I can see out my window right now.  Back then, I had to bring in coffee from Hong Kong and now I have three Starbuck’s stores and seven knock-offs of the same within a 10 minute walk of my office.  So predicting the future in China is not a science; heck, its not even an art.  I would liken it to a pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey game played by at a birthday party of some cargo cult voodoo priestesses.   Yea, its that much of a crapshoot.

But what the heck … its only my job to assess the China market and plan growth strategies for my clients, so I am going to go out on a limb here and introduce 5 themes for 2010 that I think will become even more important as the decade continues.   They are, in no particular order because they ALL are important and impact each other:

1. Growth

2. Distribution

3. Consolidation

4. Mergers & acquisitions

5. The emergence of China as a global power

As a year-end wrap up, I want to introduce each of these themes today and then we will re-visit them throughout 2010 and explore their progress (or lack thereof).  So let’s get to them …

The last decade has seen China grow in importance in companies’ global strategies … from just a blip on their radar screen at the turn of the century, China is now a major – if not THE major – strategic initiative for many companies.  And the reason?  Growth!  And its not just because, in 2009, China was the only market in the world to grow more than 8%.  The rumor perpetuated by politicians and angry journalists that China is ONLY a source of low-cost labor and a way for evil capitalists to export jobs from the U.S. is dead-wrong: China is a source of good-old top-line growth. In the midst of all the management theory bouncing around boardroom walls, it turns out that customers are important.  As a former sales manager of mine once told me, tongue firmly planted in-cheek, “Kent, I’ve done some research and have determined that 100% of our revenue comes from customers.  We better focus on them.”  And you know what?  China can be a great source of new customers for many companies.

We just completed the annual business survey for the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai and determined that over 60% of American companies were in China primarily to serve the China market … they were looking for growth!  As U.S. and European companies are emerging from the dark depths of economic depression in the past couple of months, I have increasingly had serious discussions with CEOs about ways to grow in China.  They have all said that they feel they have just scratched the surface of what they could – and should – do in China and they need to do more.

A sub-topic under our “Growth” theme for this year will be companies’ expansion into China’s Tier 2, 3 and 4 cities – its not only important to be in China but you have to expand across markets here as well.  Remember that a Tier 2 city in China can still have nearly 8 million people in it so we are not yet talking about selling into rural areas … this is still urban marketing.  But gone are the days when  company could just set up a sales office in Shanghai, Beijing or Guangzhou and hope to do enough throughout the country.  We see many companies today making significant efforts to expand their China footprints and throughout this year we’ll talk with some of these company leaders to find out what they are doing and how they are doing it.

Closely associated with the “Growth” theme is our second theme, “Distribution” … I guess this is overstating it but if you want to grow, you’ve got to actually get your products to market.  Companies who are already in China need to find a better way to get more products to more markets.   Companies are discovering that China is a VERY large and fragmented market and your route-to-customer in one region will not be the same as in another region.  We’ve said it before in these Podcasts but you will never – repeat, NEVER – find one distributor to represent you all over China.  I don’t care what industry you are in, it ain’t gonna happen.  Sure, your distributor will TELL you that they can do it, but they cannot, at least not as well as you need it done to realize the growth that you need.  You will need to take over that responsibility yourself, to find the right combination of distributors to reach the right markets.

In 2009, we did a lot of work for clients to assess the strength of their own distribution, typically benchmarking their operation against their competitions’ (both local and foreign).  And more often than not, we found huge gaps … geographies not covered, certain sectors totally missed and important customers under-served.  These clients are using 2010 to rebuild their distribution.  Sometimes they need to tear things down and then rebuild them … but more often than not, they just need to identify the gaps and start to fill them.

Not only do we need to address the people part of the distribution equation but we also need to consider the supply chain infrastructure.  From sourcing to manufacturing to transportation to warehousing and, finally, to distribution, foreign companies in China are reassessing how they handle their entire operation.  Growth without a firm distribution and supply chain foundation is impossible so 2010 will be the year when companies will start to get very serious about improving both.

The third theme that I think will be important in 2010 and beyond is “Consolidation”.  As I just said, China is a large and fragmented market and a key contributor to that fragmentation is purely the number of players involved in any particular sector.  For example, China has over 100 automotive OEMs … not just 100 brands but 100 distinct auto manufacturers (a long way from what we used to call the “Big Three” in the U.S. which is now, depending on how you count it, probably more accurately described as the “Big One-and-a-Half”).  In pharmaceuticals, there are over 3,000 manufacturers in China and over 10,000 pharma distributors.  Most of these are what China calls “sub-scale” which is a polite way of saying, in effect, that they are too small to survive very long on their own and really have no opportunity to grow very much.

The Chinese government is strongly supporting consolidation and are, in many cases, selecting key companies (often State-owned) to move to the top of the food chain in this Darwinian, survival-of-the-fittest process.  I did a Podcast recently on the Big Four automotive companies (including First Auto Works, Shanghai Automotive, Dongfeng and Changan) and how they are looking to acquire companies inside and outside of China to bring under their rapidly expanding umbrellas.  Look for some major automotive moves in 2010.  In pharma, the government is forcing the smaller distribution companies to merge with the larger ones, so much so that the rumor on the street is that there will be only one distributor per province in the end.  Personally, I don’t see how this can happen, at least in my lifetime, so while the end state is unknown, it is absolutely certain that consolidation will be the trend.

Foreign companies playing in China will want to play close attention to consolidation trends in their own industrial sectors.  The competitive landscape will change greatly as consolidation takes place … your competitors will be stronger, wealthier and have a larger geographical footprint.  In many cases, consolidation will result in a broader product portfolio, making it more difficult for you to compete with them toe-to-toe.

Our “Consolidation” theme leads us nicely to the fourth trend, “Mergers and Acquisitions”.  Not only will local companies grow through M&A but foreign companies are increasingly looking at growth by acquisition, particularly those who have been in China for awhile.  There are multinational companies who came into China through a joint venture many years ago but who are now, for all intents and purposes, operating as a wholly foreign-owned enterprise (or WOFE).  Once they did the deal, they started growing organically, adding products and distribution territories so that, over time, they have built quite a good presence.

However, they have gone about as far as they can go organically and, to speed up time-to-market and increase depth of market penetration, they are looking at acquisitions.  In the past couple of months, we have done some Podcasts on China M&A and will continue that again in the New Year.

Our fifth and final theme is a bit trickier and I put it under the heading of “China as a growing global power” … however, this requires some unpacking.  Here on the China Business Blog and Podcast, we tend to avoid so-called “macro views” and, instead, dig deep into the specific strategies and tactics that companies are using to succeed in China.  We don’t talk much about the goings-on in Beijing, the ins and outs of political leadership.  Its that not this is NOT important – it is – but such palace intrigue can often be quite far away from the day-to-day issues that company management faces in China and, for most of us anyways, we have very little direct influence on the seats of power.  Besides, our daily experience is in the trench warfare of markets, not hanging out in the rare air of the Zhongnanhai leadership.  And my momma always told me to talk about what you know…

However, I think we are seeing an emerging power and even “attitude” from Beijing that warrants mentioning and awareness.  Basically put, the Beijing leadership has been making more unilateral decisions lately and is doing so quite confidently that the rest of the world will not punish or even censure them all that much.  Just a few days ago it was announced that China executed a British citizen for drug trafficking, despite the VERY loud protests from the West that China should take some time and think about it.  The view from Beijing since the execution is that this is an issue of their “judicial sovereignty” and that the rest of the world should butt-out.  In the many articles I have read on this, the journalist inevitably mentions that Britain is China’s third largest trading partner and hints that British authorities are trying to “keep lines of communication open”.  Which means that, although they will whine a bit, nothing is going to happen to China because of their actions.

I mention this, not to criticize either side for their behavior – and I am sure there is lots of criticism to go around – but rather to highlight that we are moving into some new territory here.  2009 was a heady year for China … the Olympics, the fastest growing economy in the world, huge cash reserves, significant investments in U.S. t-bills all added up to an administration that, frankly, thinks they are pretty bullet-proof.  You can be sure that, increasingly, the Chinese government will be making more unilateral decisions and will be less and less sensitive to the opinions of other international players.  How it plays out is anyone’s guess … but suffice it to say that this will be a factor, starting in 2010.

One word of caution here – just because things are happening in Beijing does not necessarily mean that there will be a direct impact on what you are doing in your local area.   All governments move along their own timelines … and some would say their own dimensions of reality … and these timelines are often best measured using carbon-dating methods, things move so slowly.  So please don’t assume that I am prophesying doom and gloom … this is just another data point you will need to include in the algorithms you use to understand what is happening in China.

So there you have it … my predictions for the future.  Radical and cutting edge?  Probably not, but I am very certain that we will see these themes come into play and interact with each other this coming year.  As for each of you and your companies – include these themes in your strategic planning.  Assume that your competition is moving in these directions and challenge yourself and your China management to be able to articulate, in detail, how you are going to handle all of these, both defensively and offensively.

One of my favorite quotes about the future is from Alan Kay, the American computer scientist, researcher and visionary, who said “The best way to predict the future is to invent it.”  It has been true for the past quarter century I have been in China and will be so for the next 25 years – China is a unique environment where you can, literally, create your own future.  And this is what we at Technomic Asia hope for you in 2010 and beyond which is why we end every Podcast with our motto: “In China, everything is possible but nothing is easy.”  We wish you all a very Happy New Year and we’ll see you next time on the China Business Blog and Podcast.

We are at the end of a two-part interview with David Thomas, Founder and Managing Director of Think Global Consulting, based in Sydney, Australia.  In the first part of our interview, we explored the long – and often complicated – relationship between Australia and China.  As members of the Asia-Pacific Rim group of nations, there is a lot of activity going on between the two countries … and, as we’ve seen in the media this past year, not all of it has been smooth sailing.  I started off this last part of the interview by asking David to talk a bit about some of the Australian firms that are finding success in China and what their attitudes are today…

Those who have been doing business in China for awhile are quite familiar with the differences between the State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and the Privately-Owned Enterprises (POEs).  For those of you not familiar with this distinction, let me break it down for you.  The POEs are just that, companies owned privately with little or no government involvement – they are often run by business-savvy executives with global business experience.  The SOEs, to put it succinctly, are seen as hulking, unprofitable behemoths chocked full of aging assets and run by 55 year old Party hacks in moth-eaten Mao suits and greasy comb-overs.  OK … maybe I am being a bit too hard on them, but the term “SOE” has been used as a pejorative descriptor more often that not.

After Liberation in 1949, the Chinese Communist Party brought all businesses under their control and POEs were, for all intents and purposes, completely eliminated in China (as was nearly all foreign investment when they were unceremoniously kicked out of China).  Through a series of disastrous events in the 50s through the 70s (the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, etc.), the government proved that, not unlike their Soviet cousins, they were terrible CEOs – factories were inefficient, poorly run and churned out bad-quality junk that had no relationship to any market demands whatsoever.  That wasn’t as bad as it seemed because China retail and commercial trade was not yet standardized so bad products were also hard to purchase.  Go figure.

One of the many reforms that the Deng Xiao-ping administration started in the early 80s was captured under the Party phrase 民进国退 (min2 jin4 guo3 tui4): “POEs will advance; SOEs will retreat.”  What this meant, in effect, was that the Party wanted to get out of the business of being in business and started the long, mind-numbing, ulcer-inducing process of unwinding the complicated SOE culture … which included, for many people, guaranteed housing, education and healthcare.

Fast forward to the mid-2000s and you begin to see private Chinese companies really moving the market.  Thanks to China’s joining the WTO in the early part of this century, various sectors in the China market were opened to foreign investment, particularly retail and distribution/logistics.  This led to further (and more rapid) modernization of China’s business environment and it looked as if the SOEs were going to go the way of the dinosaur, only to be studied by business anthropologists who dug up their jerry-rigged balance sheets and padded expense accounts.

But don’t count the SOEs down for good … we see that there might be life in these old war horses yet, in part because the Chinese government and the Party (one in the same thing here) sees some advantages to keeping their fingers in the business world, particularly in areas that have remained the jurisdiction of the government such as automotive, oil & gas, media, etc.  Not to over-simplify things but these SOEs have two unique competitive advantages over their foreign competitors: first, the SOEs are not held to strict growth and profitability metrics and are encouraged by the State to get as big as possible, regardless of margin targets; and second, the government makes available an almost unlimited stock of growth capital through forced lending from the State-controlled banks.  Imagine if you, as a business executive, were told by your shareholders, “OK … here is the deal – we want you to grow this company.  Don’t worry about profits, just bring in the revenue … we have ways of dealing with the P&L.  And when you need money, just ask.  We’ve got plenty.”  Sounds like a dream scenario, right?

Well, it seems to be working and we are seeing a surge in some of these SOEs – in automotive, the so-called “Big Four” (First Auto Works, Shanghai Automotive, Dongfeng and Changan) are on a consolidation tear, encouraged by the government to acquire smaller, regional automotive companies, much like GM, Chrysler and Ford did in the early days of the U.S. auto industry.  The Chinese oil, gas and mining giants are actively looking outside of China for investment and, though they have been rebuffed by some foreign governments, are slowing expanding their global footprint.  Several of the larger SOE construction equipment companies are aggressively expanding, both inside and outside of China (as a side note, some say that this is why Carlyle’s acquisition attempt of construction giant XCMG did not go through last year … that the government wanted to maintain control in what they saw as a very strategic industry).  All of these SOEs – and many more besides – benefit from very easy capital lending requirements from State-run banks.

A recent article in the New York Times highlighted the pressures that Chinese banks are under to insure that they keep their lending capital accounts well-stocked and rumors are flying around China that the government is requiring China banks to raise their capital adequacy ratios.  Some might see this as a slowing down of lending.  However, I interpret it as just the opposite: the government wants the Chinese banks to keep good reserves of dry powder to be able to lend to those, predominantly, SOE companies that need growth capital.  It’s a “go slow to go fast” strategy if there ever was one.

All of this has led to private chats over dinners and drinks all over China that the government is trying to reverse their dictum of the 80s and say, rather, 国进民退 (guo3 jin4 min2 tui4): “SOEs will advance and POEs will retreat.”  While I seriously doubt we will ever see this in an official government document, the government’s practices are certainly encouraging this.  The SOEs are no longer run by Party hacks … their CEOs are often Western-business educated and understand very well both international commerce and the unique requirements of doing business in China.  They are dressed in Armani suits, have their hair styled and show up at the right parties, all the while maintaining their status in the Party-with-a-capital-P!

Just this past year, we’ve been involved in more competitive intelligence programs with our clients, helping them understand the ever-changing landscape around them.   It used to be that they were just interested in understanding their foreign competitors; however, more and more we see Chinese companies – and particularly SOEs – coming to the forefront of our clients’ concerns.  And given the competitive advantages these SOEs bring with them, everyone is very smart to be concerned about them.

So the question you need to answer is this – do you know your SOE competition?  Do you know who is backing them?  Who is running them?  Do you know what their growth strategies are and what their plans are to grow in the market?  Do you know what they think of you?!?  I can almost guarantee that they are no longer the lazy competitors you once knew.  You better understand them because they are a big threat, whether you know it or not.

We are in the middle of a discussion with Bill Powell, senior writer for Time and Fortune magazines.  In the first part, we talked about China and the rest of the world, how we try to make comparisons to what is happening in China with what we have seen in the past.  In this Podcast, I wanted to start off by getting Bill’s take on the challenges of covering China.  I prefaced my question by saying that, in our consulting practice at Technomic Asia, we are very careful not to talk about “THE” China market … there are, in fact, MANY China “markets” taking into account big cities, small cities, northern cultures, southern cultures, urban and rural, etc.  I asked him to talk about the practicalities over covering such a vast subject and the challenges he finds in trying to do so …

Maybe I am being unfairly smarmy, but smarmy is sometimes the only club I have in my bag.  However, there is a potential flaw here in that, in the interest of coming up with the Index That Explains All, we are missing a TON of subtlety.  And trust me, I do the same thing … it is very human to want to find a Unified Theory.  Oh … and I am usually not very subtle.

But I think there are a couple of things we should be thinking of here …

First of all, a single manufacturing index is potentially misleading because there is not a single manufacturing environment in the world.  Sure, saying that “in general” Mexico is cheaper than China is OK, but you start breaking this down by manufacturing sector and you’d start to see a lot of differences.  The article says that Mexico makes a lot of sense for things like automotive components being shipped to the U.S. … well, auto manufacturing in the U.S. just got the rug pulled out from under them and they DRASTICALLY cut all sourcing.  And it would make sense that the first cut sourcing from China because, for landed cost to the U.S., it is not as competitive.  Look at individual sectors: alternative energy; wafer fabrication; food and beverage.  We might find the same thing but we might not.

Secondly, the business press tends to gloss over a key point of international business by focusing on EITHER cost savings OR growth, but never in combination.  The simple fact remains that, while China might be getting more expensive on a bill of material line-item basis, the pull of its growing markets is enough for companies to ignore one-sided thinking about costs and, instead, consider their entire businesses.  If I am an auto parts manufacturer and am thinking about the sales from a factory, I am going to look at my global sales opportunities … and if I am located in China where the auto market is still growing at double digits, I might be willing to trade a few points of manufacturing cost over a plant in Mexico where the markets in their sphere are receding faster than my hairline.  As we’ve said before in these pages, cost cutting will only get you to business heaven … all companies need to find a way to GROW!  And China is leading on the growth index in almost every sector, far greater than anything in North America.  I’d rather see an index on manufacturing costs to products shipped to China … this is where the growth is and where our eyes should be also.

Third, I don’t think we should be looking at this as a competition, a horse-race between nations where we identify winners and runners-up.  Some very grave errors have been made over the last 30 years by companies swinging on the Manufacturing Pendulum — first we move everything to Taiwan (and close down the U.S.), then we move it to China (and close down Taiwan) and finally back to Mexico (where we close down everything else and start all over again).  A mature global business thinks in terms of “and”, not “or”.  We should ALWAYS be thinking “China and Mexico” (and Poland and Russia and Brazil and…).

Fourth, I am very hesitant to base any view of global business on a survey done this year.  We are in the Twilight Zone in terms of our understanding of the puts and takes of the global economy … the floor has dropped out and we are suspended in mid-air, Wiley Coyote-like with an “Acme” anvil in our hands an a panicked look on our face.  Any survey of ANYTHING this year should have a big ‘ol asterisk on it making a disclaimer that the results may not have any relationship to a future reality.  Based on points 1-3 noted above, I think we are going to be seeing a lot of changes in these numbers in the very near future.

In no way do I want to minimize the findings here … it is very true that manufacturing costs have been on the rise in China for a number of years.  It is a fact of life.  But as those costs have risen, the world in and around China has changed drastically and companies should not only look at raw manufacturing costs to plan their global strategies.  First ask the question “How can we grow?” and then (and only then) decide where to put your operations.

Unless you have been living in a hole or the dark side of the moon for the past year, your life has somehow been impacted by the global economic slowdown.  You, a friend or a family member have lost a job; your municipal budgets are being cut; heck, your OWN budget is being slashed.  It has not been a fun year, even here in China where things are still moving along at a pretty good clip.

Though there are signs that things are getting better, I am not convinced we are totally out of the woods yet.  But just because we have no guarantee of where things might be going, that doesn’t mean we can crawl back into our hole or retreat to the backside of the moon … no, we need to keep moving forward.

And at Technomic Asia, that is exactly what we are doing.  For many years, our consulting practice has been involved with foreign companies doing all kinds of alliances in China: from joint ventures to licensing to distribution to acquisitions, we have helped our clients put their alliance strategy together and then execute it.  Up until about a year ago, we had been seeing a real upturn in acquisitions in China: the government rules for acquiring companies were loosening up and foreign companies were looking to China for new growth opportunities.  Then the bottom fell out of the economy and companies put all that activity on hold.

However, as things settle around the globe, multinational companies are looking for ways to grow and China seems a very good place to look for that growth.  And one of the methods they are returning to is growth through acquisition.

To capture this wave, we have brought in a new team member to Technomic Asia: Dr. Kim Woodard.  Kim has had over 30 years of experience in China, first coming here in the 70s in the earliest stages of China’s opening to the West following Nixon’s “Ping Pong Diplomacy”.  Armed with a Ph.D. from Stanford, Kim was soon a respected leader of foreign companies’ earliest advances into China.  Kim helped establish A.T. Kearney’s China practice and then went on to help big names such as John Deere and AMP establish their China operations.

Most recently, Kim had his own firm, Javelin Investments, to assist Western multinationals with acquisitions in China.  We wanted to bring Kim in to Technomic Asia to give us the ability to provide a complete M&A advisory practice – from initial strategy development all the way through to negotiation, closing and integration.

Given the returning importance of M&A in China, I wanted to have a series of conversations with Kim about M&A and, in his experience, what makes for a successful acquisition in China.  Attached is the first in a series that we will roll out in the coming weeks.  I hope you enjoy it!

Download this podcast
Download audio file (20090403_deep_thoughts.mp3)

Sheesh … can’t a guy get away for holiday without the world falling apart??  I go for 10 days of sun, sand and minimal Internet and come back to find the world upside down.  AIG needs more money (to fund bonuses? foreign banks? Liddy’s baseball card collection?) and President Obama is firing CEOs (not that many others have wanted to do the same in the past but lacked the political will and cajones).  China dope-slapping Coke in its attempted acquisition of Huiyuan is counter-slapped by Australia for Minmetals attempted investment in OZ Minerals.  An apt description from Dr. Venkman in Ghostbusters: “Cats and dogs living together!  Real wrath-of-God stuff!!”

Not that the situation would be any different if I would have been on the frontlines last week, bravely Podcasting and blogging about the world from my 5th floor Shanghai office … but I do have a bit of a Rip VanWinkle feeling about it all.  To have so much happen in the space of just over a week makes my head spin (causing the too-small brain inside my rather large cranial capacity sound like some Cinco de Mayo maraca jam session).

The suddenness of all this – and too much free time on a beach – has led me to think of three deep thoughts:

Deep Thought Number One: the age of dominance of the western multinational company (MNC) is over. Actually, I think this dominance has been over for some time but we’ve been so busy kicking the body and yelling “Look!  Its moving!” that we’ve not realized its dead.  Certainly this is true in manufacturing … that happened some time ago when we started worshiping at the alter of the god Wal-Mart to receive the deity’s blessings that came from cheap products manufactured in low-cost countries.  I am not saying we would/could/should have done anything differently, but we are where we are.

So maybe the proper way to say this is that we Westerners need to lose the illusion that we are in total control of the world.  We are not.  And the last stand where at least Americans could claim dominance – the financial sector – has completely lost its mojo (and most of its money).  The title “Bank Manager” has become the new oxymoron replacing “student-athlete” and “country-music”.

Practically speaking, this means that Western companies will now be the seller as often (or even MORE often) than they are the buyer.  For every Coke-Huiyuan situation we will find Chinese companies buying medical companies (ala Mindray), mining rights (ala Minmetals) or car companies (ala a billion rumors in the market about various GM divisions being schlepped to the Chinese ).  Certainly, there are massive financial and cultural hurdles to overcome for Chinese companies and institutions to become major buyers, but there is definitely the motivation here and there are certainly enough Western assets – distressed and otherwise – for them to pursue.

Deep Thought Number Two: China WILL become a stronger global player in several sectors. This is a natural result of the first … if there is a leadership vacuum created by the decline of Western firms, someone will step into their place.  And the Chinese seem to be the most likely to come off the bench and make the winning basket.  I see three sectors to keep our eyes on – two are no-brainers and one might be a long-shot.

The first sector where China will begin to gain global leadership is, obviously, automotive.  Already the second-largest auto market in the world, China is also the leading supplier of auto parts and components to the world.  China will begin to leverage this supply chain dominance into actually creating cars to sell into other markets.  It is already happening in southeast Asia where a number of Chinese suppliers are exporting cars.  And Chery attempted a distribution agreement for small cars with Chrysler in the U.S. before the U.S. auto world turned upside down.  Finally, China has declared that they WILL be the global leaders in electric cars and technology – in the next three years.  That is very aggressive but it seems the entire economic and political system is focused on doing this.  Look for the leading China auto companies – SAIC, FAW, Dongfang, Changan, Chery and the cheeky BYD – to flex their muscles internationally.

The second sector is medical device.  Again, China is a leading player in the supply chain of components to the global medical industry but strict regulatory requirements have kept them largely from being very strong in Western medical markets.  The Mindray acquisition of Datascope last year was their attempt to change that – Mindray is the biggest Chinese medical device company, competing against the big boys of GE, Philips, Toshiba and Siemens.  Their acquisition of Datascope, a mid-sized U.S. player in the patient monitoring device sector, was Mindray’s first entry point into the U.S. market.  Look for them and others to follow. But look particularly at China becoming an even stronger growth market for medical companies of all kinds.  China will be investing a big chunk of their economic stimulus package in their medical sector in an attempt to rapidly upgrade the penetration and quality level of medical care for their 1.3 billion population.  As they do this, there is going to be a lot of money out there to purchase medical devices, pharmaceuticals, lab equipment and even healthcare management solutions.  Any medical company of any size should be looking at China as their key growth market in the mid-term.

The third sector to keep your eyes on – and I know I am out on a limb here – is the financial sector.  What?, you say.  A centrally-controlled, socialist system with a partially convertible currency is going to become a leader in global finance??  Yes, that is exactly what I am saying.  I am not saying “tomorrow” or even “in the next 20 years”, but all you have to do is follow the money and the motivation.  China certainly has the money – both in cash and U.S. T-bills – and their motivation is repeatedly being articulated – the latest has China’s leadership saying that they hope to build Shanghai into a major financial sector by 2020 and that “the Chinese Yuan will become a new world-favored currency by then”.  Gutsy?  Sure.  Possible?  Maybe.  But are they going to work on it?  You can bet on it!

This all leads us to my Third Deep Thought:  When it comes to the future, we don’t know JACK!! I know … as the proprietor of a leading market strategy consulting company in China whose very JOB it is to predict market futures for our clients, it is counter productive to admit this.  But c’mon … consider the situation.  If, 18 months ago, you would have told anyone with half a brain and a cable TV subscription that Lehman Brothers, Bear Sterns and AIG would be toast at the start of 2009, we would have assumed you had only a quarter of a brain.  Two years ago – even in the midst of big changes already happening in the automotive market – if you would have said that the U.S. Big Three would be on the edge of global collapse and that BYD (hitherto known as a battery maker) would make the biggest splash at the Detroit Auto Show, we would have taken away the last 25% and made you ride the little bus.

The truth of the matter is that we – meaning pundits, consultants, politicians, TV news anchors, banking regulators (if there are any left) – have NO idea what is going to happen next.  Sure, we know that “down” is still the trend and that “flat” is the new “growth”, but the details of which movers and shakers will actually be the ones shaking and moving is a complete mystery.  So let’s give up trying to predict where things are going and start act like they are going to go somewhere.

This means that we – and by “we” I mean “we Westerners” – get it through our neatly coiffed (but thick) skulls that we are not going to be returning to “normal”.  This economic crisis is not just a speed bump on the journey that we’ve been on since the dawn of the industrial age … it is a fork in the road with a car-swallowing pothole in it, at the bottom of which is a pack of very hungry lions who have been subsisting only on lettuce and Fruit Roll-ups.  OK … that metaphor needs a bit more work, but the bottom line is that EVERYTHING has changed!  The products, pricing, distribution, supply chain, competitors and even regulatory environments of your business are changing radically.  New players – many of them Chinese – are not just playing in the shallow end of the business pool; they are swimming in the deep end and, frankly, many of them look pretty good.

What has not changed is the advice for Western companies regarding China – we have been saying this for a LONG time and, in fact, we can maybe put a sharper point on that advice which is: your company’s future WILL be involved somehow with China so find out what it is now and start working on it.  In the midst of the global economic meltdown, China is still one of the best places for pure growth in most sectors.  You are probably not going to find growth in your home markets in the U.S. or Europe so why keep banging your head against that wall?  Net-net: if China is not at the top of your list of “Ways to save your corporate ass and position yourself for the future”, then you are missing the boat.  That is a fact that I feel 100% confident in predicting.

I give this background because today’s topic is “Engineering in China” and it was prompted by an email I received from Roger this morning.  He sent me a link to an article that says that China is now the global leader in indexed engineering publications – in other words, more words about engineering are coming out of China than anywhere else in the world.  I sent Roger a note back on the topic and, not seeing any shame in being lazy and re-purposing content, I thought I would riff on it a bit more here.

It would make sense, with all the manufacturing in China and the number of schools graduating HUGE numbers of engineering students here, that the total volume of engineering publications coming out of China would be quite large.  Heck, China is the number one exporter of engineered products … why shouldn’t it also be the leader in exports of articles about engineering?  However, as we often see in China, “volume” does not connote “quality” and that would be my primary concern in this case – just because there are a lot of engineering articles coming out of China does not mean that China is a leader in engineering best practices.

I think we have talked before in these pages about some of the challenges in engineering in China, particularly the differences we see between engineering education in the West and here in China.  In the West, students are trained in “engineer-to-solution” methods where they are taught how to provide a total solution using various principles of engineering.  Sketch a challenge out on the back of a napkin and a Western engineering student should, theoretically, be able to give you several ways of solving it (it seems like U.S. engineering students are always participating in some invention competition or another).

In China, the training is more “engineer-to-print” where students are taught how to “read” a problem (a blueprint, data output, etc.) and then solve that particular problem.  Foreign friends and clients here who run engineering departments are constantly challenged by their local staff who want to be given a problem to which they can apply their standard toolbox of formulas to come out with the “right answer” (I still remember our English students bringing us the TOEFL test and wanting to know which of the two choices was “right” … when actually, BOTH of them were “right”, given the situation!  Very frustrating for them as well, I’m sure!).  They have to work very hard to get their local staff to stop applying solutions until they fully understand what the problem is.

A British friend of mine runs an engineering department at one of the biggest Chinese car makers.  He said that the greatest frustration he has is working with local engineers who understand engineering theory…but don’t drive!!  He told me of a time that they were designing a car seat that kept rattling once the vehicle reached a certain speed.  The engineers said, “That’s OK, my bicycle seat rattles too when I go fast!”  My friend could NOT seem to get them to understand that this was a TOTALLY different situation that required a different solution!!

Roger embodies the Western approach to problem solving.  The small teachers college where we worked had a flat roof over the dining hall and, after heavy rains, the pipes would clog up and would not be able to drain the water, leaving a VERY heavy and dangerous weight over our heads (it did not promote good digestion, to have the Wading Pool of Damocles suspended above you over dinner!).  The engineers at the school did their best to unplug the drains, but it just didn’t work – so they threw up their hands and said, 没有办法 (mei you ban fa “nothing we can do about it”).  Roger, being Roger, did not agree with this assessment, nor did he agree with the basic problem.  The issue, said Roger, was NOT that the drains did not work … the issue was that the water was still there!  Just because the drains didn’t work did NOT mean that you could not get rid of the water.  After another nerve-wracking dinner one evening, Roger went down to the local store and purchased a long section of rubber tubing.  He then went up to the roof, put one end of the hose in the water and tossed the other end over the side of the building.  Using some magical principle of physics that I think he called “gravity”, he started the flow of water out of the hose and, after some time, the roof was completely drained.  The school’s engineers were VERY impressed and proceeded to go buy more sets of tubing to deal with other buildings on campus (I think the local store ran out of supplies and purchased a truckload of tubing the next week, wrongly thinking there was a bull run on the rubber tubing market … and that stuff is probably still there, 20 years later!).

By NO means do I intend to belittle Chinese engineers … the market is making quantum leaps every day and, to be honest, the quality of “engineering to print” can be phenomenal and much better than the West (the copy-market benefits from this!).  But there is still some way to go, as the editor of the Chinese Journal of Construction Machinery is quoted as saying about the engineering articles coming out of China, “… their quality is still an issue. Many of China’s EI papers are less than satisfactory.”  That’s OK … give it some time and there will be millions of engineers embodying the Spirit of Roger solving more problems than you can shake a rubber hose at!

The concept of global supply chain nodes becomes important when setting up plants in this new workshop of the world. Blue jeans companies, for example, might choose to produce denim in China but manufacture the apparel elsewhere.

Retailers also can form partnerships with local manufacturers to gain an edge in China. Haier, one of China’s largest appliance manufacturers, introduced its products to the United States through Wal-Mart. Today, Wal-Mart imports account for more than 1 percent of China’s gross domestic product.

Despite the potential cost savings, manufacturers must pay close attention to supply chain control if they want to thrive in China. This means manufacturers must buy from reliable vendors and monitor processes closely.

In her previous column, Teagarden wrote about China as a market base. Next month, she’ll discuss China as a research base. You can follow her “China Insider” series of columns here.

Technomic Asia’s Steve Ganster earned his MBA from Thunderbird and has participated in various China seminars at the school over the years.

To read the full article, hit the PDF link at the end of this summary. Here’s a quick overview, borrowed from AmCham Shanghai’s site:

The August 2007 Mattel recall was arguably the most damaging for China this year. Mattel shook already weak consumer confidence in Chinese product quality and safety when they recalled 1.5 million Chinese-manufactured Fisher Price toys.

Despite Mattel’s apology that design flaws and poor specifications were largely to blame, confidence in Chinese product quality remains low. More recently, Australian-sold Bindeez beads (Aqua Dots in the U.S.) were recalled after being found to contain a chemical that metabolized into gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB), better known as the “date rape” drug, when ingested.

Questions surrounding toy safety are at the forefront of American minds this holiday season, which begs the question: how did we get into such a quality crisis?

For years, American consumers have enjoyed falling prices for goods made in China thanks to relentless cost cutting by retailers such as Wal-Mart and Target.

But the spate of product recalls in recent months — Mattel announced another last week — has exposed deep fault lines in Chinese manufacturing. Manufacturers and analysts say some of the quality breakdowns are a result of financially strapped factories substituting materials or taking other shortcuts to cover higher operating costs.

Among the China consultants and other experts quoted is Technomic Asia’s own Kent Kedl. Read the full article from the LA Times.

With its export-driven economic growth on the line, the Chinese government has taken aggressive steps to safeguard the reputation of its goods. [...] The measures are “a combination of window dressing and substance,” says Steve Ganster, the managing director of Technomic Asia, a Shanghai-based consultancy.

“The window dressing is important politically, but I think there will be true substance that, like anything in China, will trickle down and have an effect in the bigger market.” But until that effect takes place, the drumbeat of product recalls looks set to continue: on Tuesday, reports emerged that Mattel would announce another toy recall, over lead-based paint traced to a different Chinese manufacturer.

Read the full article on Time’s Web site.

Today’s installment of the China Business Podcast comes to us courtesy of the National Association of Manufacturers. Steve Ganster, the managing director of international strategy firm Technomic Asia, appeared on NAM’s radio show to discuss his new book, “The China Ready Company,” which he co-authored with Kent Kedl, Technomic Asia’s executive director and the regular host of the China Business Podcast.

In this interview, Ganster discusses the origins of “The China Ready Company” and a tool he calls the China Readiness Assessment, which Technomic Asia has used as a starting point in developing China strategies for dozens of companies large and small.

For more information on the book or to try out the China Readiness Assessment, you can visit www.chinareadycompany.com or e-mail Kent at kkedl@technomicasia.com.