China Business Blog and Podcast

Download this podcast
Length – 5:15

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

For those who live or travel regularly to Shanghai, you have been the victim of the city’s wild abandon to prepare for the World Expo – new roads, bridges, tunnels, metro lines, bus lines, bike lanes, stoplights, security cameras … the list of infrastructure and hardware upgrades goes on and on.  Well, now that the Expo is finally here, many of us have been able to take advantage of that infrastructure … I, for one, am quite pleased with the new subway lines, making it much more convenient to get around the city.  However, the 9 squillion visitors a day to the Expo mean that there are just more people riding the subways and driving on the roads so a bit of the allure has rubbed off.

But all of these so-called improvements remind me of an old joke: a city slicker is lost in the countryside; eventually, he happens upon a local walking along the dirt road. The guy asks for directions back to the city and the local makes several unsuccessful attempts to explain the route. Finally, the local gives up and says to the city slicker: “Well, I guess you can’t get there from here.”

Needless to add, the point of this little jest is that there is always a way to get from point A to point B.

But not necessarily so in China. We may be all-too-familiar with the Confucian saying: “A journey of a thousand li begins with a single step.” Which is good advice (provided you know what the heck a li is), but it omits a crucial precondition. There first must be a road to walk on. Put another way, you may know your destination, but finding the path to get there is a whole ‘nuther matter.

Case in point: The Shanghai Pudong airport opened to much fanfare in 1999. Its size, capacity and architectural splendor was (and still is) truly world class. Anyone that calls Shanghai home can be proud of it … and even more so since they completed Terminal 2. What’s more, it was built in record time. However, the highway to the airport took a lot longer to complete. For the first year or two one had to pass through an obstacle course called Pudong, dodging pre-modern horse carts on the way to the post-modern airport. So while the destination was ready and waiting, there wasn’t a decent road to reach it.

Excepting the Maglev train, of course. Another marvelous example of modernity, which, unfortunately, had its own destination issues. True, on arrival at the airport the train seemed a welcome alternative to the long taxi line; one could whizz along at speeds of more than 400 km per hour all the way to Jinqiao, where … you waited in another long line for a taxi to get you home! Now don’t start writing me nasty letters. I am aware that the Maglev has since been connected to the #2 subway line and that getting to downtown from Pudong airport is now a breeze. But note the year: this happened in 2006, roughly six years after the airport opened.

The drive to modernize has had similar results in other areas. In keeping with the WTO provisions, China is opening up new forms of investment for foreign companies, though the process is frustratingly familiar.

Step One: The new rules are announced with much fanfare and praise from global punditry.

Step Two: One year later, the application procedures are announced, again with much fanfare and more punditing from the pundits;

Step Three: One year after that, applications are actually accepted by the government, with very little fanfare (by now the pundits have moved on to touting new developments, see Step One).

As I was saying, this process causes foreigners much rending of hair. Which in my case, I cannot afford because I cannot find my hair. For those of us that value convenience, efficiency and modernity, new forms of investment are useless unless we have means to access them.  Most foreigners (particularly Americans) have acquired the detritus of efficiency: daily planners, PDAs, alarm clocks, etc., all of which calculate time to the nanosecond. As such, a beautiful airport, or a beautiful new business opportunity, are anathema — without a means to reach them.

But before we get too huffy, keep in mind that we were warned of the dangers. Way back in the early 90s, Deng Xiaoping said that development in China would be “like crossing the river by feeling for stones.”

Today, we are standing on the banks of the rushing river we call Chinese Development looking across to the land of riches and eternal happiness on the other side. There are a couple of stones peeking out from the rushing rapids, but they look a bit slippery. So we need to tread carefully. Better still, we should watch while someone else crosses the river before us, to see where he steps. One day, there will be a solid bridge to cross, but in the meantime, many will fall in the water and be swept away.

Be that as it may, it’s silly to think that China should build roads (or bridges) for the convenience of foreigners. Like I said, no one made us any promises and if the existing road takes it toll on you, well, it tolls for all of us. In the meantime, buy a compass and a pair of hip-waders.

Technomic Asia’s General Manager, Kent Kedl was quoted in a article today about Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty’s trip to China. Kedl reflected on the ‘new normal’ for Minnesota and American businesses, which is, China will be a part of their strategy period as one the leading economies of the world. This is not a question of a US domestic economy going through a cycle and it will return to what is was in the past. This is an issue of China becoming the largest economy and the second largest export market for Minnesota surpassing Japan and Ireland. That is the new normal.

Kedl is quoted by Adam Minter in a story for MinnPost, “Minnesota’s not going back to being the same old economy. China’s not going to stop being the second largest economy in the world. Everything has changed.” Governor Pawlenty is leading a delegation of 42 business leaders from Minnesota to China, its mission, establish and reinforce relationships that benefit consumers and each other’s economy.

Kedl references a Chinese saying,”if you have a relationship, then you have a road,” according to Minter’s piece. Adam Minter is a an American writer in China. His blog is Shanghai Scrap.

Download this podcast
Length – 5:10

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

On his first trip to China, one of my clients reacted to this country, as most foreigners do, with a mixture of fascination and utter dread. He was overwhelmed by the size of the country and its dynamic (one might say, hyper-dynamic) society. Over dinner one night, he asked me my opinion on the fundamental difference between China and other cultures. Now, I never miss the opportunity to pontificate on any subject, especially one that I don’t understand completely (see any of my previous columns). So I offered him my view: The fundamental difference between China and the rest of the world, I said, is that Chinese people are born entrepreneurs; they have an near manic compulsion to start their own business.

Linguists believe that language is an accurate reflection of what a given culture considers important. For example, the Inuit are said to have 14 different words for snow – and so would you if you were knee-deep in the white stuff for most of your life. [Author’s note: I am from Minnesota, a state in the US where, for a good portion of the year, we, too, are surrounded by snow. However, unlike the Inuit, we do not have 14 words for snow; rather we have over 14 swear words for snow as in “that %$@# *&%$ &^%$# snow is so %$#! deep I cannot get my *&^% *&^$# car out of the *&^% driveway!!”.]

The preceding sentence reveals that Americans attach great cultural importance to the vice of impatience. Indeed, we are a deeply disturbed people, and pity the person (the next guy that cuts me off on the Yannan Expressway) who pushes us beyond our limit, which, quite obviously, is way below the world norm.

But I digress. The Chinese language reflects the entrepreneurial spirit of the people in a variety of ways. For instance, the term “start up”, referring to opening a business, can be expressed, alternately, as: 成立 (cheng li), 建立 (jian li), 开 (kai), 设立 (she li), 办 (ban), 创立 (chuang li), 创办 (chuang ban). There are more ways to express this sentiment, but I have forgotten them. What’s more, I cannot distinguish between the phrases; their subtleties are lost upon a lout like me. But one thing I do know, they all mean: “Let’s make some money!”

Should you remain unconvinced by the linguistic proof of China’s entrepreneurial obsession offered above, well, just step out on into the street. You’ll be instantly bombarded with pitches to purchase just about anything you’ll ever need (and much that you’ll never need). If you happen to be driving and happen to stop at a stoplight (unlikely, I know), then you’ll be assaulted by a dozen guys loaded with all things automotive: newspapers, lighters, phone chargers, steering wheel covers, Shanghai maps (because you look lost) and even world maps (because you really look lost). Now, I’m not saying that the Chinese are the only people with excessive entrepreneurial drive. But they do bring a degree of optimism and can-do spirit to the idea that most others cannot match. Indeed, they sometimes bring too much.

Awhile ago, I was walking through a street market with my kids. Within seconds, we were surrounded by hawkers. Now the interesting feature of street market vendors in China is the aggression with which they pursue their trade.  As you walk by the stalls, they will yell out “HELLO!!” followed by a recitation of what they are selling.  To wit: “Hello DVD!!”, “Hello CD!!”, “Hello T-shirt!!!”.  It can be a bit disconcerting, but one gets used to it … I suppose as one eventually gets used to a root canal or open heart surgery if one has had enough of them.

Anyway, one merchant was touting figurines of a little boy, who, after pouring hot water on his head, tinkles. The hawker shouted at me in the template style: “Hello, Pee-pee boy!”. Many heads turned, I assuming, hoping to see some tall foreigner in Depends fighting valiantly against incontinence problem. The man’s sales tactic might be a tad suspect, but there was no denying his enthusiasm. He knew that I wanted and needed a statuette of a small boy relieving himself. What he didn’t know is that his remark would take on a life of its own. When someone calls for me at home and one of my teenage daughters answers the phone, they have been known to shout: “Hey, Pee-pee Boy … phone!”

Of course, the entrepreneurial spirit exhibits itself in other ways, the notorious gauntlet tactic, for example. This ploy is based on the theory of sales by attrition. Street vendors seems convinced that you will buy from them if they form a gauntlet that you cannot avoid. By the time you reach the forty-seventh guy, you will be so worn down that you will purchase a DVD, CD or fake watch because you are finally convinced that life is not worth living without one.

Westerners believe that China’s low cost labor provides it with a global competitive advantage. While it helps, I believe that it is China’s drive to start new ventures – and to do so with such wild abandon – that presents a greater challenge to other economies.

The Pee-pee Boy tinkling on my desk is proof positive.

Download this podcast
Length – 20:06

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

In our last Podcast, I had a conversation with Steve Crandall, Vice President in charge of Implementation Services here at Technomic Asia.  We talked about how important people are to a winning China strategy … how to look for them, recruit them, train them and keep them.  After we were done recording it, I asked Steve if he thought that maybe we were being too “basic” … that this was stuff that people already know.  He said, “People might know this stuff, but its always good to be reminded of it … knowing and doing are two different things.”

Well, it turns out that Steve was right … because since we posted that Podcast, we have had LOTS of comments on how useful the information was and how important it was to revisit the basics.  So to that end, we are going to go “back to the basics” again in terms of thinking about China and building your China strategy.  This is particularly critical during these times in the corporate business planning cycle … the silly season where bold strategies are considered and aggressive plans developed.  And China – given its centrality to most global business plans – is susceptible to such ridiculous hopes, dreams and schemes.  So let’s go “back to the future”, if you will, and think about our China strategies from the beginning.

Click on the links to listen to today’s Podcast …

Download this podcast
Length – 20:32

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Following is part two of my interview with Steve Crandall, VP for Technomic Asia in charge of our small- and mid-sized enterprise (SME) practice.  Today we focus on the importance of hiring and retaining the right people in your China operations.

Download this podcast
Length – 6:12

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Here on the China Business Blog and Podcast, we focus on being very logical and very practical … at least as logical and practical as China allows one to be.  Over the 25 years we have been working in China, we’ve seen a lot of experimentation, trying this and that to see what works.  We’ve even done a fair amount of it ourselves … and that’s fine for many multinational companies with deep pockets who can afford to try this and, if it doesn’t work, try that.

However, there is a group of companies for which this experimentation approach doesn’t always work so well … the Small- and Mid-sized Enterprise or as they are commonly referred to, the SMEs.  And that is the theme for a new series here on the China Business Podcast – The SME.

To discuss this topic with me, we are going to bring in the newest member of the Technomic Asia team, Steve Crandall, who recently joined us as Vice President in our Implementation practice.  We have been seeing a need lately to increase our capabilities in helping our clients execute their organic strategies in China – setting up manufacturing, hiring, establishing sales teams and pipelines, executing a sourcing strategy etc.  Steve comes to us with a long history in China, starting in the 1980s when he was a student here.  Steve went on to set up the first foreign owned car dealership in China when he set up Crandall Ford up in Tianjin (Steve comes from several generations of Ford dealers back in Ohio).  He then went on to start up several manufacturing and sales operations for SMEs in China, incubating them until the client was ready to take over.  After a stint at Ernst and Young where he had to wear a tie to work everyday, he came to join us.  Steve has been a good friend for a number of years and we are thrilled to have him in the Technomic Asia family.

There is no standard definition of the SME, just as there is no standard definition of the Multinational Corporation, or MNC.  However, generally, the SMEs are defined by their size – less than 500 employees – and their ownership – privately held or invested by a private equity company or other financial backer.  Now I’m sure I’m going to get some letters about this … because some subsidiaries of MNCs essentially have to stand on their own and really act like SMEs.  As my teenagers say: “Whatever!”  The key commonality here is that an SME is facing the same challenges in China as any other company here but they often have less global experience to work from and they typically do not have such deep pockets to do a lot of experimentation.  They have to get it right the first time.

Over the coming weeks, we are going to explore some issues that impact SMEs in unique ways such as HR, manufacturing, sales, operations, etc.  You will be hearing many of the same themes that we’ve been hitting for years here on the China Business Podcast … but we will be discussing them as they impact the SME and will explore several unique ways that we’ve seen SMEs handle these issues.

We begin the series today with the age-old issue of market opportunity …

Download this podcast
Length – 18:17

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

I would like to begin this post with an apology … its been awhile since we checked in here on the China Business Blog and Podcast!  Thankfully, it seems we have not been forgotten as we’ve received many notes from loyal listeners asking how we are doing … if everything is ok.  I can assure you that, yes, things are just fine here in Shanghai, China … in fact, its because things are going so well that I just have not had the time to get these Podcasts recorded and posted.

We’ve been working on a series of discussions on mergers and acquisitions in China with Dr. Kim Woodard, one of the leaders of Technomic Asia’s M&A practice here in China, and we are continuing that today.  It is appropriate that one of the reasons we’ve been so busy lately is that we’ve seen a big upswing in M&A activity for clients here in China … lots of strategy development and target identification, the early stages of an M&A program.

Well, today, we are going to talk about a stage of the M&A process that, we believe, is unique in China – we call it “deal cultivation”.   Remember that we’ve been talking about the relatively “young” market for M&A in China … we are still in our first generation of doing deals here and there is not a lot of experience floating around.  Therefore, it is critical that we help bring the Chinese companies along in the process, helping them feel OK about it while, at the same time, doing what we call “discovery” – finding out as much about the target as we can ahead of the more formal legal and financial due diligence process.

I started today’s conversation with Kim by asking him about deal cultivation and why it is so critical in China…

Download this podcast
Length – 26:04

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Well … its been awhile since we’ve posted a Podcast.  Sorry ‘bout that!  I took the week of Chinese New Year off and tried to ignore my computer and email.  That was nice … but then I really paid for it coming back to work afterwards.  Now I have been able to dig out from everything and get back to our series of Podcasts on China M&A.

If you recall, I have been having a series of conversations about China mergers and acquisitions with Kim Woodard – a vice president here at Technomic Asia and one of the leaders of our M&A practice.  The theme we have been orbiting around is “reducing risk” … this is because the failure rate for China M&A deals is quite high.  We estimate that fully three quarters – that ‘s 75% for the CPAs in the crowd – of deals that reach the letter of intent stage fail to close.  So that means, for successful M&A, we need to focus on reducing risk at each stage of the process.

Today, we go back to the beginning and talk about, what we feel, is the most important stage in China M&A … target selection.  Here is a conversation that Kim and I had just this afternoon in our Shanghai office…

Download this podcast
Length – 8:27

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

We just received a comment from a faithful Podcast listener which spawned some interesting ideas here at China Business Podcast World Domination Headquarters (located in beautiful downtown Shanghai).  Full disclosure here … the “faithful listener” that made the comment, Dave, is actually a good friend of mine.  So I guess this is kind of like responding to a review of an elementary school play made by your mother … but I will take it where I can get it!

In any case, the question was a good one.  Dave asked, “Tell me this, as you think about the last 20 years, do you see a noticeable shift in the energy and excitement the Chinese Governments (local and central) have for recruiting western companies to expand their businesses to China? In the collection of articles I see, and recent business development work, I get the sense that there is a growing indifference. Is the China domestic growth ‘engine’ becoming so strong that western investments have become ‘ho hum’?”

Great question and good timing, Dave.  Because not only is this a topic of conversation among foreign companies here, but the Chinese leadership is talking about it as well, although in somewhat less-than-direct terms.  Chinese President Hu Jin-tao just this last week made a speech that, I think, is going to be referred back to in years to come as marking a turning point in Chinese economic development.  As far as speeches by politicians go, it was … well … a speech by a politician, and a lame-duck politician at that.  Remember that President Hu is expected to step down in 2012 and hand over the reigns to new leadership.  The leading candidate is Xi Jin-ping, one of China’s “princelings” with a significant political pedigree here, but a lot can happen in the next two years so stand by for further updates.  So President Hu is looking down the road at early retirement and he is trying to find ways to cement his legacy.  He’s already tried a couple of things.  Mr. Hu was behind the tepidly-received 和谐社会 or “Harmonious Society” campaign leading up to the Olympics which attempted to get people to stop spitting on the streets and be nicer to each other in public.  No one here has paid much attention to this – as evidenced by my messy shoes and bruised body from riding the subway to work every morning.

So this past week, President Hu had a chance to speak at the Party School of the Chinese Communist Party … now when I say “Party School”, I am not talking about the University of Wisconsin or Bowling Green.  This “Party School” is the institution that trains all up and coming cadres in the Communist Party of China, or CPC.  They used to teach these cadres how to wear musty wool Mao suits and engineer their comb-overs to cover bald spots … but now, they have more serious things on their minds.  The topic of President Hu’s speech – oddly, not covered much by the mainstream Western media – was on economic development in China.  Here is the English synopsis from the CPC website:

“General Secretary of the CPC Central Committee, Chinese President and Chairman of the Military Commission of the CPC Central Committee Hu Jintao delivered an important speech, stressing that we shall seize the opportunity to undertake the historic mission to take speeding up the transformation of economic growth mode as the important target and strategic measure to deeply carry out and implement the scientific outlook on development to unswervingly accelerate the transformation of economic growth mode and constantly improve the quality and efficiency of economic growth and increasingly raise the international competitiveness and the risk resistance capacity of Chinese economy in a bid to get higher quality, larger space and broader road of development.”

Got that?  Yea … no wonder this was not picked up by mainstream media.  I am actually interested in this stuff and I started to doze off by the line about “unswervingly accelerate the transformation of economic growth mode” (as a side note, this might be good advice to give drivers here in China because they tend to accelerate in a “swervingly” manner … President Hu’s people can contact me if they want further advice on this one).  Anyway, the speech in Chinese was not much more thrilling (like political speeches in ANY language, the Chinese for such situations tends to be very flowery and over-laden with adjectives).

In the past couple of months, China has been crowing about its 8% growth while the rest of the world is in the dumps and President Hu was responding to accusations that China’s economy was build on a foundation of sand … that government investment in infrastructure was going for short-term growth while ignoring long-term economic drivers such as technology innovation, consumer spending, etc.  Such accusations are not only coming from foreign sources but locals as well … the running joke in China is that the current leadership is pursuing the 保八计划 or “Protect the 8% Plan”, at any cost insuring that China reached that magic 8% growth that everyone thinks they need to avoid economic collapse.

This speech, I think, was intended to tell everyone that, “No, we really do have a plan here … we are not just going for short term development but we are trying to set China up for success in years to come.”  And how is that to be done?  Well, President Hu listed a lot of things: encourage the new energy sector; reform agriculture; support the growth of science and technology … heck, I think he even called for the development of a bubblegum to arrest male pattern baldness (a key concern for much of the world’s political leadership these days … they may want to pay attention).  But jumbled among the disparate ideas is a key phrase that President Hu used that responds – finally! – to your question, Dave.  President Hu said that China’s economic development is going to be driven, in large part, by “independent innovation”.

This phrase, “independent innovation”, is an echo of rumblings we’ve been hearing in China for some time.  Just last November, several Chinese ministries came out with the “Indigenous Innovation Product Catalogue”, a listing of approved vendors that government entities can purchase from.  The restrictions on this Catalogue are quite tight and makes it difficult for a foreign firm to get on the list, spurring many foreigners to accuse China of being “protectionist”.

Are they being “protectionist”?  I don’t know … that’s kind of a loaded word and it can be applied to other governments as well (similar accusations have been leveled at the U.S. for keeping China out of their oil, technology and agricultural sectors in the past).  But what they ARE being is “independent” … and that means, that, yes Dave, I think they are going to value foreign participation in China’s markets differently.  Not necessarily “less”, but certainly differently … whether or not it is “less” determines what we do about it.

This is a topic we are going to keep our eyes on this year and is closely related to one of the “Themes for 2010” that we identified in December of last year – China’s growing confidence in their own power and importance in the global economy.  But suffice it to say that foreign companies are going to have to pay even closer attention to the value that they are bringing to the China market.  We’ve been saying for some time that things have changed here … no longer can foreign companies just show up with money and cool technology and have China fall all over them.  Foreigners need to clearly articulate their value and to get local Chinese partners to agree to this value and to partner with the foreign company to bring it to China.  In the process, foreigners are going to have to give up this value to their Chinese partners … the risk being that you are starting to train your future competitors.

I am often asked if business is becoming “easier” in China – as in, “are the structural barriers to foreigners doing business in China becoming less?”  In general, I think this is true … China’s entry into the WTO has brought them in line with many global practices.  Sure, there are still questions of currency exchanges and the like, but I really don’t see these as being the greatest barrier to working with China.  I actually think that business is, in some ways, becoming MORE difficult to do in China because it is more difficult to determine exactly what foreigners bring to the deal; what we can do that China cannot yet do for itself?  You are right, Dave … we foreigners are becoming less interesting to China.  We need to work harder to find out what our value is to China and sell it to people here.  This is our game to lose.

Download this podcast
Length – 10:20

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

As we’ve been saying on this Podcast for a month or so now, China had a really good 2009.  While most of the world is thrilled to send 2009 off to the Group Home for Annoying Old Years and welcome 2010 in diapers, China is still doing victory laps for their 2009 performance, even though it was down severely from previous years.  There is a lesson to be learned here … in a room of ugly people, the average schmuck is a supermodel.  And trust me … I know how to do schmuck.

But as we all know, there is the story of what is happening in China, and then there is the truth.  Not to go all post-modern on everyone here, but the truth – if there is one Truth with a capital T – is probably somewhere in between and pundits aplenty are rushing to fill the blogosphere with their version.   For some reason, every time a talking head heaves an opinion on China into the public sphere, I have this overwhelming need to comment on it, to give the general public the beneficent view of my own brilliance and expert insight.  I know, you don’t have to tell me, I need professional help, I am fully aware of that.  I’ve tried therapy, several mood-altering substances and, as a last gasp effort, producing this Podcast, but I it hasn’t helped much.  The end-of-the-decade articles on China were killers … everywhere I looked there seemed to be an opinion popping up that absolutely REQIRED my commentary!  I consider it a mark of my immense self control and budding maturity that I was actually able to lead a somewhat normal life in the midst of all of that and did not spend all my time blogging back.  Thank you in advance for your kind words of congratulations.  I just live one day at a time.

But there is one article published way last October that I keep coming back to and, finally, cannot help but comment on.  It is by Rana Foroohar in Newsweek International is tantalizingly titled, “Everything You Know About China Is Wrong”.  The title alone compelled me to read and comment on it since, as China market strategy consultants, we go to market with what we call a “correct” view of China based on 25 years of experience so I was anxious to read it.

Ms. Foroohar elucidates several reasons why China is not the economic miracle that everyone seems to think it is.  Her opinions are not rocket science nor are they all that original … over the years there have been China-doubters aplenty who look askance at the phenomenal growth in China and wondered two things: a) is it really possible; and b) is it really sustainable??  But just because something is not original does not mean that it is not worth listening to (I give you anything recently recorded by Lady Gaga and the Jonas Brothers as proof positive of this) and I would encourage you to read her article (those of you listening to this Podcast can go to our blog for the link).  Overall, I agree with most of the statements that Ms. Foroohar makes and, in fact, I think she makes them very well; however, I would like add a couple of perspectives from the cheap-seats…

One of the myths that Ms. Foroohar attempts to deflate is “The Communists are brilliant economic managers”.  The evidence in favor of this belief is that, in 2009, China was able to maintain an 8% growth in the face of what is arguably the world’s worst economic meltdown ever.  The criticism is that this growth is driven by government investment in infrastructure and that, some day, China will have all the roads, bridges, tunnels, telecommunications networks and subways that it needs and won’t be able to make the transition to a privately-driven economy.  And it is argued that this last round of economic stimulus spending in 2009 just further deepened this problem.

This is not a new criticism and, in fact, economists, China watchers and the rabble of doomsday pundits have been making this statement since China first started their massive investment campaign in the early 90s.  For the most part, I would agree … focused investment on infrastructure is, by definition, not sustainable and, someday, China is going to have to broaden their economy to bring in other, more sustainable engines of growth.  However, I would add two caveats that would argue against being too concerned about this right now.

First of all, despite nearly 20 years of infrastructure investment, China has just scratched the surface of their total need.  China is a MASSIVE place and, while the infrastructure in the big cities of Shanghai, Beijing and Guangzhou is quite good, there is SO much more to be done in China’s Tier 2, 3, 4 and smaller cities (remember that China has over 100 cities with over a million population plus a seemingly endless countryside).

What I am saying is that the need for this spending – and the associated support it gives to the broader economy in terms of employment and supply infrastructure – is not going to end any time soon.  In fact, its probably going to continue strong for the next 20 years or more.  Yes, there are many associated problems with such infrastructure investment – the housing and real estate bubble is probably the most concerning – and China is going to have its ups and downs.  But this is not a small country we are talking about where you work hard for 10 years and everything is built.

My friends and colleagues in India only WISH that their government would have a similar commitment and authority to build infrastructure in their country … if they could, then I think India’s growth would quickly catch up to China’s.  But as it stands, there are so many internal politics in India that infrastructure projects often get stalled and never completed (there is a highway construction project in Chennai that I see when visiting clients there … and for over 5 years it has remained in the same state of incompletion.  There are people at the site and they look like they are doing something … but nothing seems to get done!).

Spending on infrastructure is not going to end any time soon … but the government can do something about the types of infrastructure they invest in.  The 2009 economic stimulus package of over $600 billion from the China government earmarked over $100 billion for what is called “social infrastructure” … hospitals, schools, etc. In the long run, the return on this type of infrastructural investment can be huge … and as I’ve addressed many times before in these Podcasts, China healthcare is in desperate need of life support itself and sustained investment here will do wonders.

Secondly, we need to understand – and even appreciate – the investment perspective that the China government takes in these projects.  Ms. Foroohar quotes a business professor who observed that, although there was a nice new highway built between two rural areas in China, there was no traffic on the road.

[let me just stop for a moment and ponder what it would be like to have a road somewhere in China without an immense amount of traffic on it … living in Shanghai where traffic is so bad we actually USE our fenders, that is a nice thought . OK … I am better now.  Thank you].

A couple of quick responses to this: is there infrastructure in China that is built without any thought to its eventual use – what in the U.S. has been called the “bridge to nowhere”?  Yes, definitely.  The number of pork-barrel projects here are directly proportional to the number of people schlepping the barrels … and we have nearly 5 times that number in China than they have in the U.S.  So yes, nosy business professors are going to be able to observe such examples of poor use of capital resources.

However, I think that the professor should relish in the fact that he can stand on that highway in complete safety.  Fast forward 10 years and I would venture to guess that this same professor would not be willing to stand in the middle of that road – there will be SO much traffic on it so as to turn him into a human speed bump.  In any environment, the population expands to fit the capacity provided and in China, this is doubly true.  Where I live in Shanghai, on the Pudong side, this was just rice fields a few years ago and now it is bucking to be a leading financial capital of the world.  There are putting up an 80-story building where just 20 years ago water buffalo grazed (giving a whole new meaning to the phrase “a bullish market”, I suppose).  The primary reason behind the real estate bubble here is that people are SO confident in their speculation that they are willing to bet large sums of money on property that will quote-unquote “some day” actually be worth more than the exorbitant price they just paid for it.  Oh, that and the fact that much of the real estate investment is being driven by people not using their own money but the government’s … but that is an issue for another Podcast.

So we should not be asking the question: “Is China’s spending on infrastructure sustainable in the long term” because it is, by definition, NOT sustainable.  Of course it isn’t.  We should, on the other hand, be asking the more difficult-to-answer question “what do you mean by ‘long term’”?  We are only 20 years into a modern business environment in China, and look how far we’ve come.  Of course, you don’t drive well by admiring the view in your rearview mirror (although that might explain some of the traffic problem here) so we need to look ahead.  My point is that, barring disasters of all types, China’s near to mid term looks pretty good and very sustainable.

Of course, there is a LOT that I do not understand about macro-economics and I am sure that I will get nasty letters from the Association of Super Smart Economists of just how wrong I am.  But to be honest, how accurate are those Super Smart Economists?  They are working off of models developed in other economies in other cultures at other times and have been woefully inaccurate in predicting even the things they supposedly understand well (ala the mortgage crisis).  The fact remains that we don’t have ANY case studies to guide us as to what might happen here in China … there has never been a country in history that is this large and has made this big of an investment in their infrastructure and government spending.  The U.S. and Japan are in the same direction, but they did theirs at very different times in history when the world was a VERY different place.  Yes, China will eventually have to pull out of this model … it cannot continue forever.  But we don’t have any good examples of a situation of this scale where this has happened.  As I have said before, in China, we are working without a script AND we are working without a net!

Twenty five years ago, when I first came to China, if someone were to show me a picture of what Shanghai would look like in 2010, I’d think they were smoking something.  NO ONE could have – or would have – predicted this.  Indeed, there were multiple doomsday preachers talking about the immanent collapse of “Red China” (I love that term, Red China … like it’s a theme color for the day!).  But here we are, still technically “Red” but, so far, no collapse.  Could it happen?  You bet.  But I assume that the only completely untrue statement is “I am 100% right” so it could also not happen.  And I am betting on the latter.

Thanks again for listening.  Remember our motto: “In China, everything is possible but nothing is easy.”  We’ll see you next time on the China Business Podcast